Comments for Anima Ex Machina | Hector Zenil's blog http://www.mathrix.org/liquid Hector Zenil's blog on foundations, metamathematics and computation Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:35:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 Comment on The Game of Life: A notable discovery, not an invention by Misguiding research on Artificial Intelligence. | Anima Ex Machina http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForAnimaExMachina/~3/358152148/the-game-of-life-a-notable-discovery-not-an-invention Misguiding research on Artificial Intelligence. | Anima Ex Machina Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:42:18 +0000 http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/archives/the-game-of-life-a-notable-discovery-not-an-invention#comment-12308 [...] think that it is techniques similar to those that led to the discovery of the Game of Life (see the previous post) that will eventually produce artificial general intelligence or agi. I think the study of the Game [...] [...] think that it is techniques similar to those that led to the discovery of the Game of Life (see the previous post) that will eventually produce artificial general intelligence or agi. I think the study of the Game [...]

]]> http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/archives/the-game-of-life-a-notable-discovery-not-an-invention#comment-12308 Comment on Anima Ex Machina by andrewthomas10 http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForAnimaExMachina/~3/369883669/anima-ex-machina andrewthomas10 Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:20:39 +0000 http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/archives/anima-ex-machina#comment-12307 Hi Hector, just to say I have just discovered your wonderful blog (you were kind enough to link to my "What is Reality" site) and I find your blog fascinating. I have been mainly interested in physics to this point but I am getting more interested in mathematics, especially the idea of the universe as a digital computer. I'll post more here as my knowledge grows. Keep up the good work! Andrew. Hi Hector, just to say I have just discovered your wonderful blog (you were kind enough to link to my “What is Reality” site) and I find your blog fascinating. I have been mainly interested in physics to this point but I am getting more interested in mathematics, especially the idea of the universe as a digital computer. I’ll post more here as my knowledge grows. Keep up the good work!

Andrew.

]]> http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/archives/anima-ex-machina#comment-12307 Comment on On the simplest and smallest universal Turing machine by Anima ex Machina » Blog Archive » HD Nanotechnology video from KQED http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForAnimaExMachina/~3/222212339/the-simplest-and-smallest-universal-turing-machine-was-found Anima ex Machina » Blog Archive » HD Nanotechnology video from KQED Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:27:04 +0000 http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/?p=155#comment-11138 [...] Some of the researchers in the video talk about how nature produce its own nanomachines, such as the flagella that let spermatozoa to swim. Imagine how many structures can be found by exploring the universe of possible simple nanostructures. We also know that starting from some few elements computing devices could be capable of universal computation (see my previous post on the smallest universal Turing machine) so they could provide the nanomachine with coded instructions for the automatic performance of any task–of course with the constraints of its mechanical capabilities. [...] [...] Some of the researchers in the video talk about how nature produce its own nanomachines, such as the flagella that let spermatozoa to swim. Imagine how many structures can be found by exploring the universe of possible simple nanostructures. We also know that starting from some few elements computing devices could be capable of universal computation (see my previous post on the smallest universal Turing machine) so they could provide the nanomachine with coded instructions for the automatic performance of any task–of course with the constraints of its mechanical capabilities. [...]

]]> http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/archives/the-simplest-and-smallest-universal-turing-machine-was-found#comment-11138 Comment on On the simplest and smallest universal Turing machine by Anima ex Machina » Blog Archive » HD Nanotechnology video from KQED http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForAnimaExMachina/~3/222212340/the-simplest-and-smallest-universal-turing-machine-was-found Anima ex Machina » Blog Archive » HD Nanotechnology video from KQED Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:00:23 +0000 http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/?p=155#comment-11134 [...] Some of the researchers in the video talk about how nature produce its own nanomachines, such as the flagella that let spermatozoa to swim. Imagine how many structures can be found by exploring the universe of possible simple nanostructures. We also know that starting from some few elements computing devices could be capable of universal computation (see previous previous post on the smallest universal Turing machine) so they could provide the nanomachine with coded instructions for the automatic performance of any task–of course with the constraints of its mechanical capabilities. [...] [...] Some of the researchers in the video talk about how nature produce its own nanomachines, such as the flagella that let spermatozoa to swim. Imagine how many structures can be found by exploring the universe of possible simple nanostructures. We also know that starting from some few elements computing devices could be capable of universal computation (see previous previous post on the smallest universal Turing machine) so they could provide the nanomachine with coded instructions for the automatic performance of any task–of course with the constraints of its mechanical capabilities. [...]

]]> http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/archives/the-simplest-and-smallest-universal-turing-machine-was-found#comment-11134 Comment on “The ways of paradox”: Quine on Berry’s paradox. by Terren http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForAnimaExMachina/~3/222212341/the-ways-of-paradox-quine-on-berrys-paradox Terren Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:48:47 +0000 http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/?p=136#comment-10675 Even better: two thousand one hundred nine times fifty three (11) nine thousand sixty three times thirty seven (11) Even better:

two thousand one hundred nine times fifty three (11)

nine thousand sixty three times thirty seven (11)

]]> http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/archives/the-ways-of-paradox-quine-on-berrys-paradox#comment-10675